Crackdowns do take time in the US but there is hope. See e.g.:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-realp...
Crackdowns do take time in the US but there is hope. See e.g.:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-realp...
This is a weird and emotionally loaded statement. Properly stated, the top four frozen potato producers have 97% of the market share.
That doesn't sound odd? In a mature market with very little technology innovation (potatoes) and very little geographic specificity (frozen), how many companies would you expect? How many laundry detergent companies are there? How many cereal companies are there?
How was this different in the past, except going back to before the interstate highway system?
Properly stated they colluded to fix prices. This is the definition of a cartel.
The issue of having four players is that it makes the coordination problem of colluding relatively easier, but they are price fixing via giant data warehouse which is algorithmically suggesting how to price.
It’s like Real Pages for potatoes, or at least this is what the article claims and what is interesting.
In an era where you can have a computer churn through a trillion datapoints to arrive at an optimal price, is it even possible to have competitive pricing as was once conceived of? The elements of uncertainty and risk have been so thoroughly eliminated that inflation seems almost unstoppable as you have such a strong signal for what the market will bear.
It’s an interesting question for the nature of free markets but few seem to have caught on to this dynamic…
Business concepts are easy. Actually doing business is hard no matter what it is. Especially when for one reason or another, 97% of the market is controlled by the potato cartel. Chances are you will find a Great Filter somewhere that ensures this cartels market share is maintained.
Yes, it’s hard because you’re trying to fight a cartel. And furthermore, the cartels distribute their products to other cartels - grocery stores that have consolidated over the years into Walmart, Kroger and Publix. And if you don’t like it, you have to change the laws which are controlled and dominated by the cartels and their donations. Thanks to citizens United. The US economy is far from capitalism.
when I hear a “farmer” complaining on the news about losing illegal immigrants and how they can’t afford to pay living wages to people working on their farms. News organizations make it sound like these farmers are individual small businesses when they are actually huge corporation themselves taking advantage of workers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/11/20/potato-ca...
By the way, I’m not condoning government ownership of corporations as the ideal solution, but I absolutely do not approve of huge corporate subsidies with no value in return for tax payers and handwaving small fine penalties for obvious monopoly behavior.
MAGA give zero fucks about antitrust, and antitrust or lack thereof has nothing to do with the creation of MAGA. That's such an absurd argument I have no idea how to even respond to it. The cornerstone of MAGA has always been nativism & reactionary politics.
I'm very, very tired of leftists shamelessly lying about anything and everything they can just to smear the Democrats.
Lina Khan had little to do with it. What significant mergers were squashed that made a difference? What significant monopolies were busted?
There are many but off the top of my head Kroger buying Safeway. Visa buying Plaid. Nvidia buying Arm. Didn't they block a cell phone merger? A mattress merger?