Siri Is Super Dumb and Getting Dumber
daringfireball.net
daringfireball.net
Steve Jobs would've stormed into that team's office and dropped a grenade...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/07/apple-upd...
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge93de21n0o
> The BBC first complained to the tech giant about its journalism being misrepresented in December but Apple did not respond until Monday [January 6], when it said it was working to clarify that summaries were AI-generated.
Flippant corporate Apple response to article, "You're asking it wrong."
Siri is probably one of the most, rightfully, panned product of all time.
Even the day it was released it was panned because it was a gimped version of the app Apple had bought from the App Store.
I don’t think it’s reached parity with the original 3rd party Siri to date (I believe you could, for example, buy movie tickets with the original Siri, which the Apple Siri hasn't ever been capable of doing).
Maybe a tie with Newton's handwriting recognition? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6qxixgQJ4M
Mostly when I’m driving or when I don’t have my phone on me and just using my Watch on cellular.
Yes I know what ChatGPT can do and I use it all of the time.
Not only do they barely work as far as accuracy and consistency, but even if they did, they aren’t being built to perform functions that are in demand.
They are solutions without pain points.
Why is someone going to use a hands-free assistant? Who would want to talk to a computer, which is an awkward thing to do?
Outside of accessibility reasons, the only reason to use something hands free is when…your hands aren’t free!
Cooking, driving, etc…that’s why timers and driving directions and putting on playlists is all anyone wants out of their voice assistant.
Apple might spend millions of dollars fixing the Super Bowl question only to find out that nobody actually wants to ask Siri that question, because I can just type that into Google or Wikipedia or something like that. Using my voice doesn’t save time or effort and it’s not discreet.
Google and search is a shit show. I’ve completely stopped using search for anything moderately complicated and have been using the paid version of ChatGPT since it integrated web search almost two years ago.
There is a lot of trivia that people want to use their voice for. Siri use to be good at that and gave you reliable answers by going directly to bespoke data sources for it.
It’s much easier to tell Siri “remind me to get the milk out of the back seat when I get out of the car” (or get in the car, get home, etc) than configure that manually.
That works as long as usually pair your phone with the car over Bluetooth.
I mean if that's not a pain point you encounter regularly because you have a wife or staff that takes care of it, good for you, but there's huge swaths of people for whom they don't have someone else to take care of that so it's a huge pain point that solving for hits. The problem is that there's not a lot of money in it because of the plethora of already existing content aka podcasts that are being give away for free so charging money for something that takes more effort is gonna be an uphill battle.
Voice activated features that are used in scenarios where your hands are available aren't very useful, especially if accuracy or level of control is poor.
So what I was saying specifically is that when people are cooking, they want to do things like set timers. When people are driving, they want to do things like get directions and play music/podcasts. But they don't really want to do all that much more than those things when they are already preoccupied with something else.
Other more complex functions that use AI aren't functions that people demand because they already have the option of interacting with their device in the first place. For example, users of the Apple notification summary AI feature don't seem particularly impressed because if your eyes are already on your device you can just read the notifications instead of a bad summary of the notifications.
IMO when tech companies design new features like this they operate in something of a bubble where they just assume that people will welcome more technology entering into very non-technical parts of their life. Solutions to problems that don't exist, more technology in places where it's not wanted, etc.
I know they throw shade on interoperability but I wish they would just make iCloud for web sort of work. You can’t create Task lists, only tasks on existing lists, you can’t attach PDF to Notes, you can’t download or upload a folder. It’s endless. And iCloud sync on windows, ice pick to noggin…
I know Spotify is “cooler” so worth the premium? I thought similar catalogs except now exclusive podcasts and maybe free audiobooks (are those good audiobooks or random authors?)
We actually usable Apple One, because spouse likes the News App, Kids like TV and Arcade and Fitness, so it’s not a bad value but it is hefty cost that keeps rising.
I would argue Humans are bad at Siri, more than Siri is bad at ____.
apple intelligence has always been a way to look good doing AI while not taking responsibility
¹ FWIW, Siri correctly answered all the "Who won Superbowl [n]" questions I threw at it just now on-device with iOS 18.3.
I’m not sure what Apple is doing anymore. The hardware has been commoditized so if they aren’t competing on software, how are their outrageous margins defensible?
"Siri in two hours remind me to: [do X]" I'm sorry I can't do X
"Siri send message to wife: [message]" I'm sorry I can't do [message]
This error type seemed to increase with the advent of Apple IntelligenceFor example, Gruber shows that Apple Intelligence which uses ChatGPT, will give the wrong answers for questions which ChatGPT itself is right 100% of the time.
It requires effort to be that bad.
You give them all a list of phrases to match (utterances) with variable parts (slots) and map them to “intents”.
You can build much better systems with LLMs now. I’ve built a few for call centers (Amazon Lex + Connect + Bedrock)
I thought the whole point of Apple Intelligence was to have ChatGPT as backend for Siri, but this does not seem that?
This is an example I put together in response to annother submission on HN a few days ago.
https://chatgpt.com/share/678bab08-f3a0-8010-82e0-32cff9c0b4...
In the real world, you would give a prompt that could handle multiple intents and properties (slots) for the intent.
But honestly, most of the time I either take an Airpod out of my ear, click on the AirPod stem, use my watch if I’m running to control volume, playback, or use the steering wheel controls on my car.
Of course this is sustainable only as long as they have no competition. But even the post-Jobs Apple has a limited glide ratio. They will eventually find that the walls they've built are better at confining the company itself than at corraling its customers.
Last year they released AirPods Max 2, a 4 year old headphone at the time, with the only change being new colors and USB-c and the same price tag. If that’s not the perfect picture of Apple under Tim Cook.
There is no "we". There's just a market (of products and of company shares) in which anyone can put their money where their preferences are and express their opinion.
What makes daringfireball toothless isn't the ratio of praise to criticism. It's Gruber's occasional willingness to defend the absurd.