Trae: An AI-powered IDE by ByteDance
trae.ai
trae.ai
We're truly building walls everywhere.
Personally, I tried copilot when I got it for free as a student and it didnt make a difference. The reason I know is that I was coding on two devices, one which had copilot installed the other didnt, and I didnt care enough to install it on the latter through an entire semester.
Its just slightly better autocomplete, by a questionable standard of "better".
There’s literally nothing an llm can write or tell you that you can’t write yourself or find in a manual somewhere.
That's like saying, there's literally nothing a service business can do for you that you can't do yourself. It's only true in a theoretical sense, if neither time nor resources are a constraint.
In such hypothetical universe, you don't need a dentist - you only need to spend 5+ years in medical school + whatever extra it takes to become proficient with tools dentists use + whatever money it takes to buy that equipment. You also don't need accountants, lawyers, hairdressers, or construction companies. You can always learn this stuff and do it yourself better!
Truth is, time and attention is finite. Meanwhile, SOTA LLMs are cheap as dirt, they can do pretty much anything that involves text, and do it at the level of a mediocre specialist - i.e. they're literally better than you at anything except the few things you happen to be experienced in. Not perfect, by no means error-free - just better than you. I feel this still hasn't sunk in for most people.
Also, local llms with an agentic tool can be a lot of fun to quickly prototype things. Quality can be hit or miss.
Hopefully the work trickles down to local models long-term.
I think you are approaching this with the wrong mindset. I see it as I'm paying somebody to type and document for me. If you treat LLMs like a power tool, it is very easy to do a cost benefit analysis.
So we're going back to the last century, but given we are in a different computing context, only the stuff that can be gated via digital stores, or Web Services, gets to have a way to force people to pay.
But I am glad we now have more paid options available. Tooling is important and people that do good work should be able to charge for high quality tools.
I would be much happier in a world full of tools licensed like Sublime Text, where I can purchase a license and just run it without the need to constantly phone home though.
Nothing stopping you to build the world you want really.
There's no moat, all the clever prompting tricks Cursor et al. are just that - there is no secret sauce besides the model at the other end.
Complexity isn't an issue either, have the model write the interface to itself.
I'm not understanding what it is about a private company launching a product that changes that?
You can do it without IDEs, nothing is stopping you. I don't think this is a new phenomenon though.
You are free to coding without spend a dime, these AI dev tool cost money because these LLM cost money to run
You can get the same experience with open source tools that you can run your own model on your pc
I mean you don't need to if you don't want to. I am gainfully employed as a software developer and what I do everyday is literally just fire up Emacs on my Linux machine and write code. To this day I haven't figured out what llms are supposed to do that a bunch of yasnippets don't.
Just like five years ago most of my day is reading and debugging code, I'm not limited by how fast I can type.
It is kind of terrifying that I probably would stop coding for the day if those subscriptions end. (I get far too much convenience out of them)
I have tried to rationalize it by the fact that I do pay for internet, and version control, and my peripherals etc
The problem is that coding was a passion, but turned out to be very lucrative profession so loads of people who can't do it want to do it.
This is why we have languages like Go, and AI tools: allow people who don't want to learn how to be developers, to get a job as developers.
https://github.com/kelseyhightower/nocode
Not even a commit: https://github.com/timdorr/-/commit/9e5a571abd3fc4f8714e8c40...
This is what a commit-less repo looks like on GH: https://github.com/verdverm/_
Unfortunately they don't show the description "starting repository for any language and project" (a play on the _ (any) token in CUE)
But if it's for some personal project that you're putting on Github, does it matter? If my code is going on Github anyway, it's going to get slurped up regardless. I don't particularly care if it gets processed by Cursor or ByteDance before it gets scraped.
I don't think the fear is that they'll steal code you'll end putting publicly on GitHub, but everything else. I guess there is some fear that it won't just analyze and process what you currently have open, but might scrape your computer for more data and so on.
I personally don't believe ByteDance would be stupid enough to even attempt exfiltrating files from developers machines, which typically are better protected than the average user computer, just trying to see the perspective of others with a more charitable reading :)
The user-based permissions model is an outdated dinosaur from a time when we could trust the applications we run on our systems to act on our behalf. Applications now act on the developer's behalf, often against the user. An application "running as me" should not have access to every resource (file or peripheral) on the device that I have access to. That's a huge blast radius.
Operating Systems really need to start treating developers as adversarial from a security/permissions point of view.
For the rest of the provided history feats, I can't really tell but most of it appeared indeed in established newschannels.
Correct.
I laugh a little every time I hear some folks immediately push the “Big Bad China is just trying to steal our data” narrative. My immediate reaction is, “Grab some tea and let’s sit down real quick, so I can tell you what some of our companies right here in America and our government do with our data.”
If that happens to be an editor from China instead of US, I don't know what difference that would make? Both governments in those countries are crazy about spying on both their own citizens and everyone else, and have their corporations under surveillance.
As long as the editor doesn't send opened files/files from my drive to some remote backend, I couldn't care less about the nationality of the developers.
I see your point but in this particular case, I think it needs to send the opened files to a backend for processing
Is this sarcasm? Isn’t that exactly what the editor has to do to do its job? How else would the AI stuff work? It’s not running on-device, right?
Edit: Actually I do have a product that is kind of Russian, Flipper Zero. I'm don't remember if I bought it before they moved the company to the US though, or while it was based in Russia.
(I am guessing that there will be a deal floated for Elon to buy TikTok in a few weeks)
Although, if TikTok's earnings can cover the payments on the loan, it could be possible.
Apparently, the executive order was illegal
It was banned because of a law passed by Congress. Representatives aren't bureaucrats.
Except that TikTok isn't legally a Chinese company, and isn't really under their jurisdiction.
Chinese companies like to be under the control of the Chinese government no more than big American companies like to be overly exposed to the US... Thus Apple being based in Ireland and keeping most of their profit outside of the US.
TikTok was a threat, and will remain a threat until it’s divested from or shut down.
All algorithms are monitored by Oracle such that only user actions can determine what they see.
So, unless you're claiming that "Oracle" is actively colluding with China, you're letting your worldview be defined by government propaganda.
The Pro-Palestine thing that TikTok refused to suppress at US Gov's command, is not "China promoting Eastern causes", it's "Americans" taking a position that the government wants suppressed.
Thus Biden being forced to cave and at least pretend that he cared about Palestinians towards the end of his Presidency... Which he stopped caring about once Democrats had lost and it no longer mattered what Democrat voters think for the time being.
They have a lot of companies with very large consumer, and their market is saturated already. Time to expand to the rest of the world.
That being said, I am using (Chinese) Deepseek r1 because there isn't currently a free LLM on par with it. I am careful with what I share though, a little more so than with any others that are not locally fun.
So as a non USA citizen, I'm way more afraid of USA than I am of China.
Which is why I would like the US govt to have as little data as possible about me (who knows what the mainstream politics will look like, things that are very innocent today might be punishable by death in 10 years).
Chinese govt, on the other hand, can have my data freely, since I don't think I'll ever move to the Mainland China.
> (…) (who knows what the mainstream politics will look like, things that are very innocent today might be punishable by death in 10 years).
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think I’d ever consider moving to a country where I believed politics to be so unstable that an action could go from “very innocent” to “punishable by death” in the span of a decade.
(I also understand that my outsider view on the US political system isn't well-informed. Still, better safe than sorry.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_country
It doesn’t seem plausible that in countries where even euthanasia isn’t allowed things could get so out of hand that the death penalty would not only be reimplemented but it would devolve so fast that you’d start executing people for things which aren’t even crimes right now.
What I see is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_oversea...
As I've already said, I never claimed china are the good guys. Just that they aren't the worse guys.
And why would you see enemy tanks on an island? What you do see are many many Chinese ships and planes, constantly violating Taiwanese air and sea boundaries.
For example, China killed a lot of people. They were all Chinese.
Look at conquered regions like Tibet and Xinjiang.
Look at how they set up police forces in foreign countries to keep an eye on Chinese citizens living abroad. Even having kidnapped and illegally held Chinese citizens in England because they posted anti-CCP messages on WeChat.
Look at countries like the Phillipines (not even a direct neighbour) who are trying to hold on to small fishing islands just off their coast because the CCP claimed those islands in the 1970s.
Remember a few years ago when they ran a week long military exercise around Taiwan... because a US representative spoke to the Taiwanese president. Sure I agree with you that the US also overstepped a line here, but for your response to be shelling the waters around the island is excessive to say the least.
Look at the aggressive nationalist and imperialist news they feed their own population, and the propaganda spread to make the Japanese seem like demons. Did you know there are several theme parks in China where children are encouraged to Bayonette a mannequin of Japanese Imperialist soldiers?
Call the US as bad as you like, but I've never seen a theme park where children are actively taught how to kill and demonise the Taliban or Nazis.
We renamed it to the Gulf of America, talk about annexing Canada, own Hawaii, fund the colony of Israel, invented Manifest Destony, destabilize democracy via the CIA, firebombed Vietnam, etc etc etc
And don't talk to me abt Chinese spying when the NSA and Five Eyes hoovers up and processes the entire internet.
Re: propaganda, read your own comment. The American propaganda machine got you to demonize China pretty well
And to top it all off, despite having a much smaller population AMERICA HAS MORE PRISONERS THAN CHINA. Its insane!
But I want to respond to this:
> And to top it all off, despite having a much smaller population AMERICA HAS MORE PRISONERS THAN CHINA. Its insane
1. The US publically acknowledges who is in prison, China doesn't. You can be disappeared in China without anyone knowing.
2. The Chinese operate several Black prisons both within and without their borders. These are Prisons without actual sentences, laws or rights. The public doesn't even know of their existence. This is where you land up as a political prisoner in China.
3. The Chinese have placed thousands of Uigur muslims in "re-education camps" (not prisons) - many of whom are only guilty by association (i.e. there's no direct crime the CCP arrested them for, other than being a blood relative of someone who did commit one of these "crimes")
4. Chinese police are already spread thin enough dealing with all the political prisoners meaning there are many dangerous criminals who are freely committing crimes in China. The CCP keeps this information under tight wraps so as not to cause a panic. As a result the Chinese are a lot less cautious than they should be so (unofficial) crime levels are much higher than they should be. It's not uncommon to hear of (or see) Children who were kidnapped and had their limbs chopped off so they could beg more effectively - there has never been a widespread crackdown on this behaviour and many perpetrators are still walking the streets forcing children to beg for them.
5. Not to even talk about the prison organ harvesting claims made by several groups who have been persecuted by the CCP. From Falun Gong practitioners to Uigur muslims.
Also don't be lazy and just call this propaganda - I could easily do the same with other messages in this thread ("CCP propaganda") meaning it's not a strong argument to anyone on the fence / on the other side. Yes, it is very anti-China, but that's because I'm trying to bring it in contrast to the very anti-US message. I don't think either country is perfect and in fact I prefer to not live in (or near) either.
The US importantly has a robust and independent judiciary where a fair trial is infinitely more likely than in China. Even for foreigners, the US legal system is accessible, understandable, and weildable for protection. It’s far from perfect, but 100x what you’d get in China.
Which countries did China invade in the last 3 decades?
Except if you have an abortion. Then laws don't matter.
Nazis, also factual.
So I don't think I fully understand the last sentence. Do you mean it's not appropriate for specifically _minors_ to have a theme park about how Nazis are bad guys? Because there's a lot of western content to this effect, including movies and video games, which are also accessible to children.
If anything, Chinese content guidelines usually prohibit graphical display of violence, so it's much more of a milquetoast thing than e.g. South Park.
My point is more to do with seeing little kids being dressed up in CCP uniforms, handed a bayonette, and told to charge at the Japanese. I also agree we see this around the world "including movies and video games, which are also accessible to children" but I draw the line where it's being encouraged by the government to do these actions in person. Combine this with the anti-japanese rhetoric taught in primary education and it's a nasty combination*. [1]
Another thing to consider is that children are generally not given access to games/movies/whatever that have such mature themes by their parents.
I'd make this same argument if I saw US children being dressed up as US soldiers and asked to charge at Nazi "soldiers". Even though we can both (hopefully) agree that Nazi ideologies are/were disgusting and deserve to be bayonetted.
> If anything, Chinese content guidelines usually prohibit graphical display of violence, so it's much more of a milquetoast thing than e.g. South Park.
Not when the Japanese or another of China's enemies are involved. Then it's gloves off.
* Also I do want to give some slack here too, the Japanese have never acknowledged or apologised for their attrocities in WW2.
[1] https://asiatimes.com/2024/07/china-scrambling-to-unplug-ant...
"(A) learn that communism has led to the deaths of over 100,000,000 victims worldwide;
(B) understand the dangers of communism and similar political ideologies; and
(C) understand that 1,500,000,000 people still suffer under communism."
Including an oral history "Portraits in Patriotism"
If this isn't propaganda against the CCP I don't know what is. Call it truthful or not, kids are being told China is The Enemy.
They're dressed up in military uniforms as early as middle school if you're in JROTC.
And funny you bring up them suppressing hate speech when here in America we've recently decided to do the opposite with X and Facebook.
I never said china has never done anything bad. There is no such country on the planet.
China doing bad stuff doesn't make the bad stuff the other countries do disappear, and my point remains valid on which one is more of a threat to nationals of other countries.
At least if the Americans win I don't have to be worried about becoming a political prisoner, forced into re-education camps, or having my organs harvested.
Also there are many more conflicts currently where China is involved than the US.
I live in scandinavia and I can tell you people aren't feeling particularly safe about USA not going to invade.
(I don't think they'll do it for real… but then again I also didn't think Putin would go into Ukraine for real so, don't take my work as gospel)
Perhaps revalidate the "thriving economy" assertion before taking the plunge though (and be mindful of how hyper-localised that is).
If I was presented with two options: waking up tomorrow as the child of a poor farmer in a third-world country, or waking up as one of Donald Trump's children, I would definitely choose the latter. However, that doesn't mean that I trust Trump more than I would trust the farmer. In other words, quality of life (or a preferred way of living) are not inherently tied to trust, morality, or anything like that.
Quality of life is inherently tied to trust and morality - both in terms of the effect of fear (a lack of trust) or isolation (a lack of moral consensus, or equality and sense of shared belonging).
[Edit: hey Europeans commenting and downvoting below, note the words "in principle" in the above comment and evaluate which of the two countries do or do not purport to stand for these things despite whatever your hot take may be on the current moment.]
Edit:// "In principle" chinas gov stands for stability, economic development and national unity...
I am happy for you and your flags.
However I didn't claim that china is more "free" just that the US definitely isn't seen as that from the outside anymore. It's not always a direct competition
As did Stalin, Mussolini, Hirohito and the National Socialist Party. It's the "how" that matters.
Sacha Baron Cohen's The Dictator is a piece of art that demonstrates this absurdity in the best possible way.
Only of of them is hypocritical, that's it.
I wouldn't trust a US data company to not capitulate to... "personal requests" by Musk or Trump any more than I trust it not happening in an hungarian, russian, turkish or chinese one with their respective leadership (official or otherwise).
"It's just US, not EU."
Have you tried the 7b?
Employees of Bytedance (and other Chinese companies) have to deal with draconian employee rules and agreements that tie them back to the rules of their Chinese mainland parent corporation and the Chinese government itself. For example look at the details that came out in this lawsuit against TikTok, where employees have to agree to uphold Chinese national interests, uphold socialism, etc.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/14/tiktok-forced-staff-oaths...
Early TikTok was basically a standard Chinese startup in terms of how they collected data to optimize the app... It's not because they cared about what "you" are doing.
The Chinese tech ecosystem is just more competitive than the US one.
Most social media companies have been careless with data until they got public backlash though... TikTok's systems are probably more secure today than anyone else's... Because of the backlash.
WeChat is an app that works inside China, so obviously it's subject to Chinese laws.
All countries have some restrictions on what is and is not okay to have on online platforms. China just adds in "social disruption" alongside content that could promote violence (which would be blocked on Facebook, etc. also)
You need to not just drink in propaganda... When something just "can't be done" (because it is being monitored), then it just doesn't matter even if you have ill intent.
Does that sound like a business or an intelligence front?
Although, they do seem willing to sell potentially.
China restricted them from selling their recommendation algorithm, and it's hard to sell TikTok without.
But, TikTok did immediately start work on an independent algorithm that has no ties to China, so that they can sell it if it really comes down to it.
And you are telling me this is perfectly normal.
Tencent's Hunyuan 3D - Tripo, etc.
Tencent's Hunyuan Video - Sora, Runway, Pika, etc.
ByteDance's Trae - Cursor, etc.
DeepSeek R1 - GPT, etc.
Unitree - Figure, Tesla, Boston Dynamics, etc.
And a ton of this stuff is completely open source. All of the Tencent stuff is. This destroys the moat of so many companies that have spent hundreds of millions of dollars training and building their tech. It's just out there for free for anyone to build with.
And has anyone been checking the volume of Chinese AI research papers? Almost every impactful paper I've read in the last month has mostly Chinese names. And a lot of those papers come with code. Usually permissively licensed.
China is absolutely killing at the AI game. They've fast followed (or in many cases led) into a position of strength.
I wouldn't want to be RunwayML, Pika, Luma, or Tripo right now. Any "foundation model" company with a single use case is getting cloned and commoditized.
edit: Please don't downvote me because you don't like the message. I'm actually fine with you shooting the messenger, but this is absolutely worth talking about. It's pretty surreal to watch this all start to unfold over the last quarter or so. I want to read what others think about it.
It is that bad that all the American companies withrew from the public benchmark library. You can only see there Chinese commercial solvers and open source ones.
(I am not in AI, so please correct me if this is inaccurate.)
I just had to talk someone I know out of using RedNote as the TikTok shutdown loomed last week -- they had ZERO IDEA about its provenance. Unless you're paying attention, it's actually not clear what's what.
1) They try similar like Zuck with LLama make sure GPT or Claude or Gemini is not the real winner in the West world like Android/iOS was for smartphone, Facebook/Whatsapp for social media/IM, Google Search for search, Windows for desktop OS. Majority people get used to to single product and they don't switch often.
2) Trying to kickstart community similar like LLama kickstarted big community around it that helped with tooling, testing, etc.
3) Slowing down development of ai companies in the west - giving them less data for training (after all midjourney, elevenlabs, llama kickstarted training on copyrighted content, it's pretty sure they using user data at least from e.g. free version of GPTo-mini) and bleeding their budget kind of war of attrition.
4) Familiarise the west audience with their ai models - after all still not many people using models like DeepkSeek since not many providers host them and majority of people don't have fast enough computer to run full models fast enough - Trae helps with that
If you really want an integrated experience, and not just a sidebar UI, you need to go the same route as Cursor and fork Code-OSS (the MIT-licensed part of VS Code, analogous to Chromium for Chrome)
I don't think it has any special api access?
Wondering if it is a fork of vscode though because right now it will be competing against cursor.
I've also blankly asked it if there's any issues with the current code, and found errors before I try to build / run a project.
But the moment it gets a little less basic, its a different story. I absolutely hate the experience. So I love it and I hate it at the same time. Is it going to replace me? I don't feel like its there yet. And this has been the case for a while now.
There is just too much money and people invested in this that its hard to say anything negative about it. Nearly every VC has rebranded their websites around an AI-driven future. And, to be fair, it’s not a fad—it genuinely works well for many things. But for now, I’m still skeptical about how far it can really go.
I'm terrified to install a binary like that
Use something like emacs/vim/kate/eclipse/qtcreator if you want to avoid "phone home" software.
If a Chinese company does the same, at most someone in China will shrug.
Does anybody feel the same? I feel like nobody touched upon this, but it's always very nice to feel interfaces are responsive.
I accessed this through a Qubes AppVM (no GPU, limited memory and CPU budget) and the presence of videos makes this a very slow scrolling experience for me.
In general, anything that involves JS/CSS animation/blur/effects makes sites pretty slow (up to unusable for me). The unlogged homepage for github.com for example, spins my cpu at 100%.
But I guess instead of writing great libraries to avoid repeating ourselves, we drop all code to a lake monster which eats it and spits out answers.
Thus it supporting English and Chinese languages.
And it may be a competitive step taken after Alibaba launched their new coding assistant.
Although I haven't tried to find a Chinese mode myself.
That it's targeted at Chinese abroad is just what I saw from Googling it and reading the SCMP (Singapore) article on it.
The company that made it is also from Singapore (even if it's under Bytedance's umbrella).
They seem to be separate from TikTok. The only thing they have in the app store for example, is some chatbot application.
¹: which is dozens of them at this point, open and not.
²: with lots of speakers and training data.
Separately, the fact that they can translate between languages where they have never seen any translation data in their inputs shows that they have internal models of the world and language, that go beyond what one might expect from a statistical parrot.
They do have world understanding - perhaps limited some by the fact that their input data may not cover a lot of everyday things.
Regardless, what is this exactly?
Also, anybody knows a decent IDE where AI is a first class citizen? So far my experience with plugins is, that they have too little context to be actually useful.
Sidenote: That marketing video was nauseating, it was moving too fast and didn't show any features for long enough or for enough steps.
If I ever have a need for buggy crap code, any random boot camp dev can write it for no money at all.
Makes you think about how they're extracting value from you to make up for this. I rack up non-significant amounts when using Claude 3.5 Sonnet for coding.
Considering the data they siphon from their other "free" apps, I don't want to think about what this does on developer machines with code bases and production access.
Recommended.
(But of course it would be nice to be able to run it against a local model which doesn't seem possible at the moment.)
Zed only has syntax highlighting and an ai assistant, but that's it. Even though Vscode (and the rest) is still also considered a text editor and not a IDE, they have by far way more features.
Sure, you get super duper high speed, but at what cost?
- Void
- Melty
- Pear
- Aide
Just another AI wrapper around VS Code smh
Effort would have been much better spent on getting AI auto-complete "merged" with LSP. But who is listening? Pretty much everyone these days think they can plug an LLM and have their life issues sorted out.
It's sad because I have seen some truly remarkable progress in LLMs, but I feel like we aren't allowed to be honest anymore that LLMs aren't going to replace programmers or moderate our expectations.
For any semi novel development I want to write it myself to establish the patterns I like and get an understanding of what I'm building. It's the boring stuff I hand over to Claude.
But literally every single programmer I know has this opinion.
With what I was left with at that point, it probably would have been a wash to fix that code or just start from scratch manually.
I don't blame Loveable, I think it's a wonderful product bordering on magic, like v0 and Bolt.new. I just think they are amazing products that have been over hyped to god-like status.
What it is just a summary of the internet.
I used to think he was competent but now I think he's a moron
Doing basic stuff with a very limited scope that’s likely well documented all over the internet, great.
Boilerplate, tedious yet simple things, works awesome as enhanced autocomplete.
More complex stuff, give it a shot, maybe you’ll get lucky, otherwise if it starts fucking up I’ve had the most success just taking a step back and doing it myself, maybe chatting with it as a live docs substitute, or a realtime stack overflow/discord programming channel which are also sometimes of dubious quality but frequently useful.
The misery really lies in getting stuck in that cycle of it just messing up over and over as you try to get it to make this thing work that is clearly beyond its scope and it’s just turning everything into a greater and greater mess of hallucinated bullshit.
I've built a couple pretty simple apps that have been basically no code beyond tweaks for me.
I do think a big knowledge gap is the acceleration of prompting by knowing how to talk about code. LLMs show a lot of difference in response between "make the top bit stay on the screen on small screens" and "make the <th> element sticky for viewports <600px".
- autocompletion (about half the time)
- questions on the syntax for certain commands (faster than looking up in the docs, usually pretty accurate)
- questions for how to solve a particular problem or gotcha (faster than looking up on SO, but also less accurate)
It's a useful tool for certain cases, for sure. But it's not a "game changer" in terms of productivity.
So I definitely think the value proposition of AI coding is higher when you have programmatical control over the workflow.
On a related note, the recent Cline Plan+Act function has also been a game changer.
LLMs are a tool. It’s also weird and counterintuitive so it takes some time to get really good with them.
I haven't heard anyone in tech say programmers will be replaced by this tech.
I have heard persons outside of tech say it, but I think they lack sufficient context.
I mean, if we get AGI, yes, we might be fully out of a job. But, so far I think many programmers agree this seems to be a ways off.
But, I think you underestimate how many programmers used to copy paste code from StackOverflow and articles, etc.
We even had/have a phrase for that: "copy pasta".
Those programmers are getting more applicable templated code than they used to get via copy paste.
When I'm coding in my preferred languages, I am faster without AI.
But, when I'm writing yaml or something else for an unfamiliar tool or platform, I do get a productivity boost, even if I have to debug the code / configuration.
Also don't believe your lying eyes.
- vs code
- vs
- IntelliJ IDEA
- Notepad++Everything that has been coming out of China is better than anything our mega trillion dollar corporation are producing and they are doing with with sanctions on the best GPUs.
I don't work in big tech, why are they so bad with sigifically more money and more advanced technology?
Google had a decade and a half head start and they can't even produce a model that is as good and as cheap as Deepseek building with no compute compared to Google.
I have been using Trae and VS Code with Copilot is laughable compare too it despite using the same models. So we can't even prompt LLMs as good as they do and they don't even speak English as a first language LMFAO.
We might be fucked and this is just the beginning.
Maybe time to learn code should be time to learn Chinese.
At the forefront of our politicians’ minds are how many genders there are. In the UK just building a new high speed railway has practically been the Manhattan project. Will we get back on track? I think the chances of that are rapidly diminishing.
Only problem is now I have no idea what they are talking about half the time.
Some C-levels newphew into computers and need a school project or something?