The Apollo 11 Journey in Photographs
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
I recall reading somewhere that the walls of the lunar lander were so thin that if you stabbed them with a pencil it would go right through.
I managed to get maybe 45 minutes at the Smithsonian on a quick visit to DC 15+ years ago. Being able to go right up next to the actual capsules that some of the early astronauts had used and seeing the rivets didn't always exactly line up, or bundles of cables tied together with bits of string... It all looked a bit rickety.
Those guys had giant balls to be strapped in to those rockets and hope for the best.
The HBO mini-series, From the Earth to the Moon, largely based on that book is also quite excellent. Go find it and watch it. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_the_Earth_to_the_Moon_(TV_...
If you're still looking for more material after that, I'd go read "Failure is Not an Option" by Gene Kranz.
1. How Apollo Flew to the Moon, by W David Woods. Don't be put off by the cheesy cover, this book goes into a lot of technical detail and does a pretty good job of explaining things.
2. Digital Apollo by David A. Mindell. A detailed look at the use of digital technology in Apollo, particularly for guidance. Lots of chewy technical detail.
These books would definitely appeal to many HN readers with an interest in spaceflight.
* How did they fake the video of the astronauts on the Moon? Please be careful to pay attention to explaining the arc of the dust they kick up.
* How did they fake the open-loop back on the recordings where the delay exactly matches the orbit of the Moon, and in an apparently unanticipated analysis 40 years later it was possible to deduce from the recordings alone the date of the recording?
Thanks.
It's a tricky problem - how do you convince someone that something is a useful, valid, thing to do if they think you're trying to harm them?