Hacker News Reader

Comment by momoschili | Hacker News Reader

Not clear to me where the novelty is in this... people have been doing similar stuff for ages, and the performance of the optics here leaves a bit to be desired as well.

Sure we can mass produce these, but we can also mass produce wafer-scale lenses, and in any serious application, a normal metamaterial lens would justify the higher cost with its performance

View on HN

> In this study, we present a simplified method for fabricating visible Fresnel zone plate (FZP) planar lenses, a type of diffractive optical element, using an i-line stepper and a special photoresist (color resist) that only necessitates coating, exposure, and development, eliminating the need for etching or other post-processing steps.

it's a very narrow line of novelty, with a set of middling performance devices... not typically something I would expect from LSA.

That's just modern science no? The low hanging fruit has mostly been picked so advances are smaller and smaller, but we're doing more and more of them in parallel so the total advancement speed is still greater.

Seems like simpler fabrication but not sure why they can't just make a master and then stamp/pattern these at scale like how gratings are manufactured.

you definitely can and people definitely do this. There are arguments that stamp patterning is better suited for optics as well - specifically point defects seem to be less deleterious and that the feature shapes (not sizes) are more readily done via stamps. However, typically a lot of semiconductor manufacturing is viewed from an electronics perspective today, where stamping is definitely considered an inferior process.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com