Hacker News Reader

I would disagree, the first amendment in fact does protect platforms for speech. If the government tried to ban the New York Times through an act of Congress, the Supreme Court would strike that down.

In this case, the fact that the platform is foreign and that the foreign owner is considered hostile to the US carves out an exception.

View on HN

Banning foreign ownership of broadcast media companies is not new. It’s just that the laws have lagged the shift from broadcast linear mediums to the internet.

Source: the FCC specifically prohibits certain ownership of broadcast stations by foreign entities:

“Section 310(a) prohibits a foreign government or its representative from holding any radio license.

Section 310(b)(3) prohibits foreign individuals, governments, and corporations from owning more than twenty percent of the capital stock of a broadcast, common carrier, or aeronautical radio station licensee.”

https://www.fcc.gov/general/foreign-ownership-rules-and-poli...

I dont think you are disagreeing

Reply on news.ycombinator.com