I'd love to be corrected, but I haven't been provided any evidence or information that suggests this ban was justified at all.
I'd love to be corrected, but I haven't been provided any evidence or information that suggests this ban was justified at all.
No
> You’re seeing what you (and TikTok) wants you to see.
No, they can show me anything, but I decide to click or not to click on it - just the same thing as HN.
Not every company should be a public one. Valve is not a public company, so what?
> TikTok could have easily gone public in the USA to protect the company and employees.
So is this. There is no reason to believe the government attack would stop if this happened
They said ByteDance is as disorganized as any other big tech company, and it would be approximately impossible for them to discretely pull that off.
It's easy to see "CCP" and think bogeyman, but it is interesting to think about how achievable it would be to pull off something shady at Google or Facebook, and apply that same thought process to ByteDance.
The CCP could mandate that the TikTok algorithm display certain types of political content, then further mandate that any criticism of the CCP be limited, especially discussion of the said censorship. Most users wouldn't know about it and leakers at ByteDance wouldn't be able to change that. It's not the US - they are punished in China in a way that doesn't happen in the US.
Who couldn't? Do we have a proof?
> It's not the US - they are punished in China in a way that doesn't happen in the US.
Do you have a comparison graph? You seem to be knowledgeable
I've worked for AT&T, and letmetellyou about disorganization and corporate ineffectiveness.