It’s a price-setting exercise. Yes, the drug-maker can walk away, but at the cost of massive punitive excise taxes on selling their drug to anyone in the US, not just Medicare Part D plans.
It's like saying taxes are a "negotiation for a contribution to the state government".
Also, they do negotiate for a very few drugs and the number is climbing. This was part of the IRA. However only drugs that are FDA approved for your issues are covered.
Before the IRA the government was not allowed to negotiate any drug prices by law which was/is crazy.
Certainly the VA can and does negotiate prices for the drugs it buys (that’s one input to the HHS Medicare price-fixing formula), but it has a formulary and is buying drugs for its patients directly.
Of course, Big Pharma will fight to slam it shut again.
It's not a negotiation between two parties with equal power, it's just the government saying "either pay this price or you'll be penalized".
The better solution is to allow parallel trade of pharmaceutical across borders.
It will force countries paying far less to pay more and conversely the US paying less.
You end up with a circular reference that spirals prices down.
At some point that price is lower than the net positive profit point.
No, no it's only a global economy when companies want to manufacture products using slaves in third world countries or they want to outsource programmers and call center employees, but not when consumers want to buy medications or DVDs at the prices they sell for in those same countries or even just want to get higher quality products they refuse to sell you here (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hershey-sues-shops-importing-br...)
Don't give in!