Do reasoning LLMs need their own Philosophical Language?

> Do reasoning LLMs need their own Philosophical Language?

Do faster-than-light starships require strangelets? Like FTL travel, it's hard to say, because we don't have "reasoning LLMs" anyway.

What we have are LLMs that build out story-documents, in which we humans perceive a fictional computer-character with text forming an internal monologue, and those generated stories seem to be more cohesive than ones without the monologue.

That means approaching this from the perspective of good symbolic logic is a mistake, since LLM algorithms aren't designed to do that. Whatever qualities make for a "good" story-cohesion monologue will probably be something else.