Sure, but in this case it's like driving your car 10 feet to your mailbox and then bragging about how it's an accelerant (in other words, the task wasn't remotely difficult to begin with and doesn't really warrant "accelerating"). I assume in this case your note about how it was written with an LLM was more just to spite the anti-LLM sentiment above though, which would make more sense.

I see you edited out the part where you made fun of the author using Lua and then called them stupid. It’s a bad look, especially using all that space to paste a script that could be reduced to 5 lines, which is pretty typical of the slop that the author has an issue with in the first place.