There's a good case to be made that if it weren't for the likes of Musk and Bezos we'd still be stuck with the likes of ULA.
They are literally pulling us into the future and i'm all for it.
There's a good case to be made that if it weren't for the likes of Musk and Bezos we'd still be stuck with the likes of ULA.
They are literally pulling us into the future and i'm all for it.
Any number of nations' governments could do this in a wealth perspective. And none have.
"The richest 1 percent grabbed nearly two-thirds of all new wealth worth $42 trillion created since 2020, almost twice as much money as the bottom 99 percent of the world’s population, reveals a new Oxfam report today." Jan 16, 2023 [1]
[0] https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/11/23829868/elon-musk-is-ev... [1] https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/richest-1-bag-nearly...
This is not a problem for me.
However, due to political decisions most if not all of that wealth is shared among people at the upper levels of the hierarchy, and third party investors.
It might not feel as a problem to you, but increasing inequality has negative consequences for society as a whole. It is well documented that more unequal societies have a higher prevalence of violence and theft, which might have direct consequences for you or your environment.
Maybe thank the taxpayers instead?
(You do realize we did this before without them, right?)
I really don't care how many shares of Amazon he has and what the current share price is.
At a glance: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/12/study-amazon-workers-serious...
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-10-25/pain-exhau...
But as I said, I think the argument requires some basic empathy/solidarity to follow.
Do you think they wouldn't if they had viable options??
This isn't even controversial.
Many simply choose to think it's acceptable, even preferable, through whatever twisted justifications.