> implying that having money in itself (and not a specific way of behaving) is wrong, unethical, and worthy of exclusion.
Having money in the abstract is not. But being a billionaire is.
Having money in the abstract is not. But being a billionaire is.
As an analogy, this is similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit.
To GP: It's less "no one should have any mass". It's more "Billionaires are like Black Holes, and therefore should be avoided" -- yes, it is a value judgement; no, it's not a blanket statement about money.