At capability levels high enough that they credibly pose a risk to national security, they obviously won't be.
Siri, use his internet history to determine if he's a threat and deal with him appropriately.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the...
> AI can process intel far faster than humans.[5][6] Retired Lt Gen. Aviv Kohavi, head of the IDF until 2023, stated that the system could produce 100 bombing targets in Gaza a day, with real-time recommendations which ones to attack, where human analysts might produce 50 a year
Putting them on weapons so they can skip the middle man is the next logical step.
It's currently quasi-illegal in the US to open source tooling that can be used to rapidly label and train a CNN on satellite imagery. That's export controlled due to some recent-ish changes. The defense world thinks about national security in a much broader sense than the tech world.
See https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/06/2019-27...
The idea that this technology carries existential risk is how OpenAI and others generate the hype that generates investment.