The link below includes results from a study which included brain imaging and comparing the results with other victims of neurotoxicity poisons
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/havana-syndrome-neurotoxin-en...
> Starting about a decade ago, a small number of Americans, mostly federal employees and many of them working in intelligence, reported similar experiences in Havana. In an instant, they heard a painful ringing in their ears, followed by intense pressure on their head and disorienting vertigo, which was often followed by nausea. Some of the victims developed long-term problems with fatigue or mobility. Other officials later reported similar symptoms while in Russia and other foreign countries, and many concluded that they had been the victim of a deliberate attack with some kind of acoustic weapon.
ototoxic, vertigo, nausea, brain damage
A close inspection of the video evidence released by the morality police concerning Mahsa Amini is quite damning. It appears the morality police allowed some intelligence branch to operate / exercise on their premises but refused to be the scapegoat once things went south. So they released video of her walking healthily into the building, of her searching a seat, but not before quickly glancing back (presumably in response to her name, called out for target lock-on by a trainer / observer "O"). This scene as she selects a seat is also important because the girls are being processing FIFO. Compare the women who are seated right before Mahsa sits down, with the women who are seated as Mahsa stands up. Except for the observer "O", all the women who sat down earlier have been processed and are no longer there, and all the women sitting down as she stands up again were not there before. Except this observer sitting in the midst of the arrested women of course.
Pay close attention to unnecessarily early starts or unnecessarily late endings of the segments: what is it that morality police is showing and why? They are threatening the higher-ups that they have already shared the evidence (minus the explanations) to implicate higher branches of government.
An unnecessarily early start is when before Mahsa stands up (presumably there is a number display). She seems scared and impatient: instead of a morality police officer coming for her, 2 such morality police officers "Bossy" and "Postpony" are seen in discussion. Certain arm movements are seen (extending one arm, while hiding the other hand, presumably to hide a trigger / squeezing bulb). Annoyed "Bossy" is seen demonstrating the things-to-be-done presumably for the umpteenth time (she is clearly impatient with Postpony's stalling behavior). It looks like this would have gone on for quite a while more, were it not for Mahsa spontaneously arriving. I believe she was afraid of the hypothetical situation where she patiently waited until her number was explicitly called out, out of fear that if the morality police accidentally skips her processing, that she might end up in deeper trouble than she already is: they might accuse her of fleeing the morality police to avoid processing. Apparently Postpony was stalling, now that the target has arrived we will quickly see that when thrown in the water Postpony didn't need further instructions to swim. Some quick admonishing of clothing follows, during which suddenly the same arm movements we saw being demonstrated before are executed. Right after the hand or wrist passed close to Mahsa's face. Mahsa has a pain reaction (presumably the eye irritant intentionally added to hydrogen cyanide intended for disinfecting ships/factories/... which usually serves to warn end-users that they need to ventilate the closed space longer before entering). Immediately when Mahsa has the pain reaction and tries to cover her face with her hands, Bossy and Postpony turn their back long before she collapses, and they also take some steps away from any hydrogen cyanide cloud diluting in the air. This is not the body language of authoritarianism. It illustrates Bossy and Postpony knew exactly what could or would happen after administering the dose. Replay that scene and look at the behavior of observer "O". The hospital reported the girl was brain-dead, and the father responded weird pink spots on her skin (just like observed during the holocaust).
I suspect at least observer "O" works in a different branch (aking to Iran's equivalent to CIA training or possibly a chemical weapons scientist, gathering data for dosage setting). It's unclear if Bossy and Postpony are real morality police employees, working under direction of "O", or if they are from the same branch as "O", and pretending to be morality police, who would in that case have been instructed to let the 3 work freely using the facility as a training ground, with Bossy and Postpony pretending to be morality police.
The cochlear amplifier (the cochlea is a mechanical amplifier) is extremely sensitive to drugs. A lot of substances are ototoxic. Imagine unknowingly suffering a non-lethal dose of brain damage, involving ototoxic tinnitus. A cluster of victims emerging above the spontaneous incidence background could share many symptoms, and in the absence of help could erroneously conclude an "acoustic directed energy weapon". Then this is cross-referenced with the symptoms of known directed energy weapons, and promptly considered to be mass hysteria.
During WWI the British developed hydrogen cyanide bombs to launch at German positions. Clearly some chemists in the British army didn't want to be involved in chemical warfare and chose a lighter than air poison gas, so that it would quickly evaporate and diffuse, as opposed to the other trench war chemical weapons.
Hydrogen cyanide may not be effective in trench wars, it seems Iran still considers it effective for assassination, debilitation.
The observer "O" is sitting on the 5th row, right at the corridor, black pants, black and white shoes, her coat (?) is black and white checkered pattern. She is constantly looking at how Bossy and Postpony are interacting with Mahsa, only looks away shortly as Mahsa collapses from vertigo and systemic failure. She is also suspectly close as Mahsa was searching a place and momentarily looks back as if interrupted (probably her name was called). She is also the only one who remained seated even though the rest of the detained women are processed FIFO.
For some reason it scrubbed my reference url's:
dang please help: the main video:
yt-dlp -f dash-video_2277485 https://www.reddit.com/r/BrothersSection/comments/xphi85/cct...
sha256sum: 809668fbb0a568bb8c923ebdecb0db33cb5837a1f314d371aa0893d1d6aefb57
the extra video:
yt-dlp -f 270 https://youtu.be/GiCSejWJMQU
sha256sum: 4f13245dbd4a6351bfef1d1c4f88e0dc130f3d9c7157a1cf45e441c052747629
Also: I don't understand Persian, but there is this investigative article (author doesn't realize she was killed with hydrogen cyanide):
https://faktyoxla.az/en/news/view/2186/how-did-iranian-media...
https://web.archive.org/web/20250114025320/https://faktyoxla...
In it is described how the regime at a certain point tried to claim she was a member of the kurdish Peshmerga, and used cyanide to kill herself to avoid interrogation.
So we have a brain-dead body of which the state coroner agrees no blows to the head etc. The IRGC then claims she killed herself with cyanide, and that she was a trained member of the Kurdish Peshmerga. This is debunked as described in the last URL (the image is much older, and Mahsa would have been a child at that time).
It is unclear to me if they intentionally chose to make the provably false claim that she was a Peshmerga soldier: if so, the above explanation could be broadcast domestically, while globally this explanation would be dumped in the trash, causing any claim of cyanide poisoning to be associated with this provably false story in an international setting, basically discrediting the correct cause of cyanide poisoning internationally. Mixing truth and fiction.
So IRGC at some point decides that the safest explanation of death is to stick to objective cause of death (cyanide poisoning), but to mix this truth with disinformation: she supposedly administered this to herself (provably wrong, since Bossy and Postpony turn away in advance of her collapsing; are they telepathic?), because she was supposedly member of kurdish Peshmerga (provably wrong: age of picture and age of Mahsa don't correspond).
Feel free to ask questions (in case I forgot to note insights, or forgot to mention alternative explanations which I ruled out other ways), and also certainly feel free to add insights.
Then there is this Iranian national detected and arrested in a timely fashion, who was procuring cyanide and ricin in Germany:
https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-police-arrest-iran-m...
It is unclear if this was a lone actor, or Iran foreign agent procuring cyanide with plausible deniability cover of being a lone wolf if caught.
take the subset of employees affected who objectively visible brain damage (not to separate the "false" and "true" victims, but to enrich that fraction for investigation purpouses, alternatively accept all self-reported victims with potentially lower signal to noise ratio as a result).
next take a subset of unaffected employees with similar task distributions as a control group
then for each person (affected or control) check the origins of all mail, check scheduled appointments with Iranian nationals, ask if they recall ever experiencing something being spritzed close to their face (they may have interpreted as something innocuous like perfume), allow them to make as many entries as possible, then ask the same question (any dates or times of occurence, especially before onset of symptoms) but for specific odors (cherry odor = control, vanilla odor = control, bitter almond odor = scent of hydrogen cyanide, mint odor = control, eye irritant = added to disinfection hydrogen cyanide for repelling human end-users, ...), then for each type you take the difference between time of symptom onset minus odor exposure event and convert to same units (floating point days for example plus or minus estimated error), convert these time intervals to reciprocals for rates ( floating point "per day"), then for each type of odor, or for each type of meeting with Iranian, or for each parcel from Iranian nationals, make a grand sum of that rate once for the affected group, and once for the unaffected control group.
then compare the mean rates between control group and affected group, and use hypothesis testing statistics to calculate the likelihood for the observed rates in the affected group given the rates from the unaffected group, if the null hypothesis of mere random clustering can be rejected you have detected that it is unlikely to explain by random chance, and those Iran associated links are proven significant (not in size of correlation, but that the correlation however small or large can not be explained away by chance).
You could redo (or simultaneously do the same exercise with different nationalities).