Matilda, the last survivor of the transatlantic slave trade
aljazeera.com
aljazeera.com
> A central element of the Black Codes was “vagrancy” laws. Through a system known as “convict leasing”, many African-American boys and men were arrested for minor offences such as vagrancy, imprisoned, and then leased out to work for private businesses. This created a new system of forced labour which again was little more than slavery. Convict leasing was legally rooted in the so-called “exception clause” of the 13th Amendment which states, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States.”
This is I think the primary reason our justice system is so messed up. Convict Leasing was and is a barbaric practice.
I highly recommend this book
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_by_Another_Name
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convict_leasing
> For example, in 1898, 73% of Alabama's annual state revenue came from convict leasing.
To think we are turning a blind eye to this in the world. It makes the US even more of a hypocrite.
For obvious reasons, first hand accounts of the transatlantic slave trade are incredibly rare. A notable exception is Omar Ibn Said [1] who was fluent in spoken and written Arabic. The vast majority of slaves were illiterate.
[1]: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/only-surviving-ara...
I think African slavery was large, but there were Romans and Greeks before, or Asian countries. Pretty much everyone I guess.
I am asking this question because when I recently discussed massive homicides, I has the Nazi camps in mind and a friend mentioned Pol Pot's as being much bigger.
The place you are in (France in my case) biaises this a lot.
https://dohanews.co/report-qatar-fifth-highest-proportion-sl...
The Trans-Atlantic slave trade was a very brutal form of slavery. Slavery existed in many forms throughout history and I don't think our current iteration of "employment" and lending is very different from many of slavery's historical forms
I'm sure you've heard this before, but that reduces "slavery" to "obligation" or "commitment", and dilutes atrocity to banal.
Most people in slavery today live in Asia and the Middle East, but there are pockets in Africa where it is common too.
Modern slaves are sold for as little as $10-$100 and are therefore often considered disposable by their perpetrators. Approx 70% are women and 25% children.
Slavery is illegal everywhere in the world but enforcement is lax or non-existent in some countries, notably Libya and Yemen.
I’m not sure it’s as extreme as you suggest. Looking up stats on slavery in different countries, there are definitely some extreme outliers, but they don’t account for that much of the global total. And by far the worst offender is North Korea, which is never mentioned in these discussion. I also have no idea how accurate these figures are, but the focus on places like Libya doesn’t seem like an honest assessment of the situation.
In any case, I’m not sure how this matters. I guess it would influence how you fight it. If it’s concentrated in a few countries then you’d want pressure on those governments specifically. But in terms of how bad the problem is, I don’t see that it really matters how geographically spread out it is.
My point, in case it somehow wasn’t obvious, is that we shouldn’t ignore the past just because problems continue.
It’s funny how people who want to deflect away from discussing the Atlantic slave trade by bringing up modern slavery always mention countries like Libya, and not the US. I imagine it’s worse in Libya, but “why focus on the US’s past when slavery is alive and well here in the present” would hit a lot closer to home and would probably be a lot easier to fix.
Jury duty is an interesting question. I’m not a huge fan of the jury system, although it may be the best of bad alternatives. Maybe there’s no good way around this one.
I get that you’re trying to trip me up (and succeeding a bit), but penal labor isn’t difficult or borderline or anything like that. It’s a straightforward “we can make money by forcing that person to work, and it’s not illegal.” There’s no justification beyond, they’re a criminal so they deserve it. Obviously, criminal punishment has to involve violation of certain rights, but I don’t see any reason for it to involve violating this right besides liking money and wanting more of it.
You seem to think that forcing anyone to work is a slippery slope, and considering where we are now, there probably is some merit to that idea.
Very wrong. Prison provides a service to society. We pay for that service out of our own pockets for our own benefit.
This should be true whether you think prison should be about punishment or reform. This should be true regardless of who runs the prison.
If society is unwilling to pay the costs to segregate the population into guilty and not-guilty fractions, they should shut down the prisons and see how expensive that gets.
Trying to offset the costs of that service through literal slavery is insane, immoral, and not in anyone's interest. No crime validates being turned into a slave. Someone being in prison has already been stripped of their freedom, and going further to lease them out as underpriced labor not only fucks with the labor market, but it should not be considered "just" punishment when PRISON is supposed to be the punishment.
Making prisoners pay $2 for fifty cent ramen is just as unethical. If you are unwilling to pay the price for a society without criminals, imprison less people, make fewer criminals, or deal with the consequences. Functioning society has costs. Trying to escape those in such cruel ways is childish, selfish, and stupid.
For the illegal stuff: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_the_Uni...
And the legal variety: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_labor_in_the_United_St...
... but _why_ point it out? What's the purpose of doing so?
https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/findings/spotl...