Is it needed to link to previous submissions without any comments?
Not OP but I've noticed that it's a common thing to do here, especially if there was discussion before.
posted 3 days ago and still has zero comments. you'd expect some relevant discussion there if someone takes the trouble to link to an older dup.
anything that comes out of the BBC should be considered as propaganda or a lie. wondering the timing and what they are trying to achieve this, by posting this now.
Nothing that anyone ever posts anywhere is completely free from bias. What singles the BBC out as somehow uniquely deserving of scorn? In what way is everything single thing they post untrustworthy? Did you read the article? It happened exactly 100 years ago, which presumably is why they posted it
> What singles the BBC out as somehow uniquely deserving of scorn?
I'm not sure I'd have said that the BBC is uniquely a recipient of scorn.
The timing is clearly laid out in the article: it was exactly a hundred years ago to the day. I think that is the size of the conspiracy here.