In the very least,this should feature in the title. In fact, previous submissions from over a decade ago also feature year in the title.
Otherwise it conveys the idea that this is some major epiphany.
I guess it would have been surprising in 2006?
And obviously Google would have been dealing with servers, where it'd be even older as they'd probably have been using PAE and each process would be able to allocate and address a full 4GB.
Common consumer laptops had 2-4 GB of RAM in 2006.
https://everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook...
I remember pretty clearly that if you had anywhere above 512MB of RAM in 2006 you had very much top-of-the-line.
That’s a different claim than your original statement of having 100MB max.
Apple released multiple different models in 2006, "early 2006" had either 512 or 1GB base (1GB for T2600, the 17" and the high-end 15) expandable to 2GB; and "late 2006" had 1GB to 2GB base expandable to 4.
Then it could have a bot create links to past submissions like the OP did and use the best arrived at title for resubmissions.
It does have the ability to catch multiple submissions of new articles but that probably has a time window of a day or so.
I suppose you could compare against wayback, and not sure I'd try to compare with an LLM or RAG.