The '90s weren't that great
slowboring.com
slowboring.com
Now you've got a lot of millennials / gen-zers who grew up in homes their parents owned, unable to buy a home (in a place that would have jobs for them) saddled with college debt and few friends outside their computer screens. I think that's at the root, and all of those metrics mean nothing to them. Housing + debt, everything else is noise.
Other than for homosexuals, transsexuals, and maybe career focused females it's not outrageous to claim the 90s were a better time to be starting your life/adulthood.
The optimism is I think the key to what’s going on here. We had used to have a positive view of and vision for the future, and by now most of the things that we were optimistic about either didn’t happen, or have made things worse.
My parents could not afford the house they own if they had to buy today, even with their now-end-of-career salaries, at current market prices—never mind with their starting salaries (and my mom was only working part-time when they bought it).
Quality of life has improved in many ways over the last 20-30 years (tech, medicine, etc), but wage increases have not kept up with cost of living in many sectors.
Well, that’s an excellent point. Our cars have become so good at crumpling to protect us that the old crash test videos that leaked to tv news in the 90s seem archaic by comparison. I remember many of them showed the dummies falling out of the cars when they slammed into a wall and shocked everyone.
My father took me to a junkyard to see all the windshields that people had smashed into to emphasize why I should wear a seatbelt. Now the car will basically sacrifice itself to absorb the shock as much as possible. Plus airbags are everywhere and rearview cameras are in all new cars.
I frequently think about how these days you can get shot anywhere in the USA. It was nice being reminded that I have very little fear of dying in an auto crash. And though many people drunk drive every day, societal tolerance for it is at an all time low.
The problem isn’t that the vehicles are getting more dangerous to pedestrians, it’s the poor safety engineering around where vehicles and pedestrians are likely to encounter one another, particularly at higher speeds.
That said, it's not always a trade-off between safety inside and outside the vehicle. Some recent vehicle trends are just dangerous for people outside the vehicle, and that's a shame.
> I remember many of them showed the dummies falling out of the cars when they slammed into a wall and shocked everyone.
This reminds me of a short Simpsons bit from the 90s about crash-test dummies.
Edit: fixed typo
Correction: "…they would not be allowed to drink while…"
That’s how much propaganda we get in the USA.
Look up the automatic seat belt fad from the 80s and 90s. To make a long story short, there's a reason why they fell out of favor; you still had to manually put on your lap belt, and a lot of people who normally would wear their seat belt correctly didn't realize they had to wear a lap belt.
Also, no one wears seat belts in India. When a car came to pick me up, there was no seat belt in the rear seat. The driver had tucked them under the seat, so I made him pull them back out. As we drove along a semi-freeway, the center divider was giant potted plants instead of a guard rail. Good luck if you happen to drift into one of those without a seat belt.
And what of the safety of the people outside of the cars?
Morning Brew had an amusing short/skit, "Big car safe…?":