Maybe we can get “mixed up” and hear in our mind as a subflow. Some populations may be more sensitive or less conditioned to filter for normality (normalcy?)
I didn’t find the authors “incredulity” very scientific, though the presentation in the tapes is quite shabby. I could have laughed milk out my nose when they used math. Who knows what else they goofed up right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics
solid matter is possible, and secondarily
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_statisti...
makes the laser possible. All that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%8...
people are fascinated with is a distant third if that. I have to admit that I've had some of the weirdest coincidences such as my mother dying the day after I got married in secret and that whenever I cast the I Ching in grad school I always got
https://divination.com/iching/lookup/23-2/
which was interpreted quite a bit more negatively in the two translations I had, particularly in that the current goal was impossible and it was necessary for the situation to blow over before you could progress. (e.g. newer translations try to be a lot more upbeat than the old ones)
The argument is that before time-space the Universe is a hyper dimensional. Vibration and periodicity giving way to the kind of probabilistic divergence described by D.D. In The Fabric of Reality. The entire universe might well spring from this vibrational axis giving rise to all. Space time would emerge from the entropic dilation.
If entanglement was the synchronization of vibrational coordinates, that “vector” could have one resolved state. I would not rule out instantaneous communication by that principle alone.
[0]https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-e...
[1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-r...
During the pandemic Steve Wolfram went off on a vainglorious scheme to unify physics (kinda doomed) but I appreciated his approach to "superspace" (the configurations of space/time that one might want to write a wavefunction over) in that causal networks must exist: e.g. two points have a spacelike relation or one is in the future of the other)