> my workplace selfhosts it, so its not affecting us.
What is more reliable (ignoring hindsight), Bitwarden's service or your workplace's systems?
What is more reliable (ignoring hindsight), Bitwarden's service or your workplace's systems?
(Edited - added 'upstream')
For instance, skip traversing the internet for in-office deployments/credential use. Also: incentives. PMs or engineers at another company have incentives that don't always align with reliability for yours.
Vaultwarden deserves a mention, happy hoster for years here.
I'll shell out cash for hosted databases... even though I'm fine with building everything else myself. Topology stuff alone usually makes this worth it.
Virtual machines and snapshots can take you a long way, though :)
When everything becomes hyper concentrated in singular environments, a problem with that environment scales the blast radius to everyone.
For example when AWS US-East-1 occasionally goes down. It’s been a few years since the last time that happened, but when it happens it’s inescapable.