Hacker News Reader

Comment by th4t1sW13rd | Hacker News Reader

The fact that one of the most powerful financial institutions in the world maintains a "Doomsday Book" of emergency legal procedures, named after the historic record of English lands commissioned by William the Conqueror, suggests they take very seriously the possibility of catastrophic financial crises requiring extraordinary measures. The document states explicitly that "The Doomsday Book is not, and can never be a finished product" - implying an ongoing need to prepare for new types of financial emergencies.

This seems both novel and somewhat concerning, as it indicates the Federal Reserve anticipates and prepares for worst-case scenarios that could severely disrupt the financial system. The very existence and continuous updating of such a manual provides a window into how the Fed thinks about and prepares for potential crises.

View on HN

> it indicates the Federal Reserve anticipates and prepares for worst-case scenarios that could severely disrupt the financial system

Yes! That's the point! You don't want to arrive at a worst-case scenario unprepared!

The US military has all sorts of files and plans on bizarre and implausible scenarios, mostly as intellectual exercises ("if we wanted to invade Canada, how would we do it?"). That doesn't imply anything about their likelihood.

nowadays it feels like plans "how to invade Canada" no longer feel so hilarious :(

> somewhat concerning, as it indicates the Federal Reserve anticipates and prepares for worst-case scenarios that could severely disrupt the financial system

It’s concerning a regulator and lender of last resort considers what happens at the precipice of last resorts?

Supposedly, the term "Doomsday Book" (or Domesday at the time) was coined because the records were unalterable once written. The book itself brought a day of doom.

But this book is a "Doomsday Book" because it's a book written to prepare for a day of doom. I'm not sure we can draw a strong connection between the names.

I think some concern is warranted, given financial crisis are real threats the the system and consumer.

The consumer can do little to prevent such a crisis, but awareness and modest preparation are a rational response.

I think it is pretty analogous to fema preparations for catastrophies. A homeowner can't stop a pandemics or hurricane. They can have an emergency kit.

Markets are both cyclical and ever-changing, so I don't see what's surprising about new types of emergencies coming up as the times change. The way we slice and dice assets and claims today is very different from how it used to be done just a few decades ago. The markets are a living breathing thing.

Would you prefer that they would not prepare for unusual circumstances? This is what any serious organization does when there are real stakes. Smart people sit down and gather information, think about likely scenarios, and write a playbook, updated over time. Seems like your response is a knee jerk entirely based on the optics of the name.

The fed responding wrongly to a crisis, even a minor one, could cause enormous pain and suffering -- think famine. I don't have the expertise or patience to actually evaluate the contents of the document, but they are definitely doing the right kind of thing here.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com