e.g.: https://www.mi.com/global/product/xiaomi-11t-pro-120w-xiaomi...
Because when you pick it up, your hand is covering up the middle of the phone. However the top quarter is unobstructed.
> And why do the cameras keep moving around?
Easy way to tell models apart.
is that the reason or just a convenient side effect? the last two models had to move the lenses around slightly so they could capture whatever they called their stereo AR/VR type acquisition so the pupil distances worked correctly. after that, there's only so many ways to arrange 2 or 3 lenses.
For instance Xiaomi is a lot more serious about the photo part (and they also sell a lot less as well, this model was only noticed in photography circles)
Most users would want to use the screen of their smartphone as a viewfinder. That either means using both hands or requiring a way to attach the thing to the smartphone.
Also, to do the image processing, that cylinder would need to have most of the processing power of the iPhone and, thus, a fairly large battery.
Low end model https://www.dpreview.com/products/sony/compacts/sony_dscqx10
High end model https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cybershot-dsc-qx100
Sony has consistently been innovating in this space but has always had basically insignificant market share. People keep complaining about mundane updates and AI crap but they won't buy phones from the one manufacturer that bucks this trend. MKBHD has a couple of videos about it (regarding the Xperia 1vi iirc).
My Sony phone has a 4k 120hz oled screen, notification led, headphone jack, fully manual camera mode, no bloatware or ai crap, great battery life (never had to charge my phone during the day). They had the battery save features years before other manufacturers. They've been doing this consistently for years. I don't know how they keep doing it, but I'm glad they do.
This is one of those things that doesn't seem like it should matter, but it does. If the lens is mounted in the exact center of the body, the images come out looking unbalanced. To produce balanced images, you have to offset the lens. Even very expensive pro mirrorless bodies are offset; that is, if you look directly down the center of the lens, you'll notice there is more camera body sticking out on one side than the other.
This is called the chirality of the optical path and it is surprisingly difficult to predict analytically. Companies will typically design the optical path, prototype it, and mount it on a jig to precisely measure the chirality. From this, they design the body with the proper offset.
Chirality is more noticeable the smaller the sensor and the shorter the lens. So on smart phones, which put tiny sensors behind wide-angle lenses, they have to get the offset just right. This explains why the lenses are in slightly different places on the body every time Apple updates their cameras.
Every mirrorless body has a center marking for the middle of the sensor, so the camera can be mounted exactly centered on a tripod. It's actually important for photos to be exactly on axis if you want to do panoramas or stitching.
The only reason the body is not exactly symmetrical is engineering and ergonomics. Many point and shoots of the past in fact had the lens exactly in the center.
And "chirality of the optical path" is not anything related to this, in fact the term is not usable in this context at all.
It was also posted by a person with a huge karma. I want to understand what happened.