Somewhat difficult to notice in a skim the article (but important) is that one of the figures criticized is Jeff Bezos, who owns the newspaper in question.
I didn't feel that way, since she specifically points it out and also explains (quite correctly) why this matter is to be treated differently for a newspaper than for any other business
Oh it wasn't a criticism of the article!
I mean, if anything that _should_ make the paper _more_ wary about spiking it. It’s a bad look. Like, even the WSJ, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, not known as one of the more committed-to-integrity media magnates, didn’t spike the Theranos story, even though Murdoch was one of Holmes’ dupes.