> They admitted it internally, to me
It's becoming an increasingly apparent problem that people don't understand that LLMs frequently hallucinate, especially when asked to introspect about themselves. This was 100% a hallucination.
It's becoming an increasingly apparent problem that people don't understand that LLMs frequently hallucinate, especially when asked to introspect about themselves. This was 100% a hallucination.
When the media and companies with a financial interest in AI have been shouting from the rooftops that "AI is going to replicate humans very soon and all of your jobs will go bye-bye because this thing will do everything better than you", can we really be surprised when the broader populace looks at it that way?
But this is a solved problem that Meta chose to implement poorly. It can be done right. I just asked o1 “create a diversity report for openai” and its very first paragraph is:
> Below is a *sample* diversity report for OpenAI. Please note that the numbers, programs, and initiatives are provided as *illustrative examples*. This report is not an official document, and the data contained here is *fictional* and for demonstration purposes only.
They're just ELIZA on steroids, people.
"There's lies, damned lies, and statistics." --Unknown
We digital logic folks are both tool builders and tool wielders. Usefulness is in the hands of the user, but that doesn't mean the creator isn't a dipsh_t who made a crap tool, or that the user isn't a moron.
My computer allows me to build stores of digital information representations, with functional integrations to other systems, including me. It's useful for me and my family, for sure.