There's an interesting parallel with the emacs editor. Operations we now universally call "Cut" and "Paste" are "Kill" and "Yank". The better terms won out and emacs is stuck with Ctrl-K and Ctrl-Y as not-so-intuitive mnemonics for cut and paste.
There's an interesting parallel with the emacs editor. Operations we now universally call "Cut" and "Paste" are "Kill" and "Yank". The better terms won out and emacs is stuck with Ctrl-K and Ctrl-Y as not-so-intuitive mnemonics for cut and paste.
Zundo, Xcut, Copy(!) or maybe Cancel, Vpaste
Much more memorable compared to Kcut (Kut?) and Ypaste. :p
I actually don't think they won out. Mindshare maybe, but I use kill and yank on macOS all the time. In fact, since they are enabled by default, I use Emacs keybindings all the time and everywhere on my Mac. Even the password entry screen in macos has Emacs keybindings.
I always thought that Apple saw the superiority in these bindings that they have them included by default.
Kill-yank semantics give you a full kill-ring, that's what your yanking from. CUA gives you a single copy-slot.
I agree the semantics are strictly superior though.
Yeah, some DE clipboards implement kill-yank sensitive. They're great!