Wouldn't "you have to pay even if we don't deliver the product you're buying" be considered unconscionable?
So Capchase is delivering their product, the financing. Which is why there would be a clause that the customer still owes Capchase even if Bench closes; Capchase has already paid Bench and wants to be made whole.
I mean, bad to agree to in the first place, but it doesn't seem like a contract where the other party is non-performant, should be enforceable.