87.4% of population experienced a decline in freedom from 2020 to 2022
fraserinstitute.org
fraserinstitute.org
"87.4% of countries experienced pandemic related inflation" is a far less interesting premise.
Nice there are alternatives for saving.
All these investments are only worth anything if someone buys them from you at a higher value.
Yes you can generate revenue from these but looking at increases in P/E ratios and real estate prices / income growth tells the story that the increases are primarily fueled by inflation.
For example compare the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic rent for a given apartment and you will see if the "underlying investment" is providing increasing value or if the value is the same or less for an older building but inflation is propping it up.
Index funds put me way ahead of inflation
The index fund may be over priced but much of the market has actual productivity that leads to dividends eventually, so whether someone will buy that off you is not about the next sucker or betting on an increase in wealth among suckers.
the borrowers that just have a mortgage for their own house while working for a paycheck don't really benefit from it. Sure, their debt has been reduced, but their wage too. And inflation is generally lower then interest, so that benefit gets wiped too.
The by far biggest winners with inflation are the people that own a lot of assets.
I recommend Broken Money for history and analysis how it came to be that things are how they are.
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/18tl490/abandoning...
The gold standard caused financial crash after crash
> We have a right, also, in various ways, to act upon our unfavourable opinion of any one, not to the oppression of his individuality, but in the exercise of ours. We are not bound, for example, to seek his society; we have a right to avoid it (though not to parade the avoidance), for we have a right to choose the society most acceptable to us. We have a right, and it may be our duty, to caution others against him, if we think his example or conversation likely to have a pernicious effect on those with whom he associates. We may give others a preference over him in optional good offices, except those which tend to his improvement.
"World's" in there is pretty important.
Why not look at the argument instead of cheaply, simplistically attacking the source based on your emotional, possibly ideological dislike?