Good intentions but I don’t expect much to come except contractor 1’s would-be competitors closing the gap or using this to throw stones based on existing contract code quality. It is easier to write code than it is to read code!!
That means increased competition and reduced costs for the government.
> or using this to throw stones based on existing contract code quality
That means code review, which results in improved code quality one way or another.
I fail to see the problem here.
Reality, company 2 wins on cost and doesn’t understand the context of what was built or the environment it was built in. They don’t understand the costs as they didn’t pay them. Company 2 quickly proposes “full rewrite!” Lower cost labor they brought in can’t perform and quality degrades till we have (insert Gov software program here).
Or it doesn’t happen.