Hacker News Reader

Brave seems to work well with its privacy shield and a button to turn scripts off as-needed.

People only focus on Firefox as an alternative. Am I missing something?

Brave CEO once said some mild hurty words about a fragile group, and so the lefty hive must not publicly support his endeavours (whilst using his JavaScript all day long lol).

I haven't the first clue about the politics but I'm guessing the response is more toxic than the original message.

IIRC, the guy donated some money to some anti-LGBT groups back when he was CEO of Mozilla Corp. People associated it with Mozilla in general (even though they were personal donations, not from Mozilla) and he ended up having to resign. He then founded Brave.

Honesty I feel more antipathy for him (and Andreesen) for saddling us with Javascript, but I understand why people don't want to use his products.

That's fine, and a reasonable reason to dislike and boycott usage. What's weird about the HN response is the silent down voting instead of calm explanation like you just did. The topic turned into moving from Chrome, and only Firefox was essentially mentioned.

As far as I know he didn't even say hurtful words. He made a personal monetary donation to a California amendment that passed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com