The AI backlash couldn't have come at a better time
infoworld.com
infoworld.com
Second, so far in my (very limited) experience, it sucks. I tried an assisted search tool the other day to search for "Do any EV charging stations offer 220v AC as an output?". The results had nothing to do with that input as a structured sentence. It was still just a bunch of links to EV charging articles, which were mostly shit in and of themselves. So the results list sucked, and the individual articles linked to, also sucked (which admittedly is not the fault of the sucky search algorithm).
This seemed like a prime example of where an LLM could shine: properly interpreting the grammar of my inquiry question, to find results specifically related to that question. But it just didn't work.
I don't think this will be an impediment at all to ownership eliminating labor jobs to be replaced by bots. Mostly because most modern ownership policy has very little concern of whether their service sucks or not.
What is a hype are LLMs. And ChatGPT I'm particular. When the masses realised they could talk to an AI and it responded like a human they ascribed all sorts of human traits to it. Which is wrong, it's just a statistical analysis.
AI can get more intelligent but LLMs aren't the way. Even OpenAI states this in their roadmap to general AI. But the market craze has led them to push LLMs more.
The grift has been at unbearable levels for months now and it actually drove me to delete my X account recently.
The whole thing is propped up on faith, hype and investment capital. Now I work in the latter and we're not impressed.
Edit: As for X, removing it from my existence was an improvement in mental health for sure.
Perhaps THAT is why we roll our eyes, not our impatience at how we can obtain the alleged benefits of the application of such monstrous poo pipelines.
My opinion, of course, but i will never make peace with what I regard as a bad idea, fundamentally speaking.