It's more: we have two clusterfucks now thus might as well use the one we know best.
At least no one tried to use YAML on the wire, so far anyway.
At least no one tried to use YAML on the wire, so far anyway.
(Source: implemented both serverside and clientside IMAP.)
IMAP is basically a database query language and as such it works as it should.
. SELECT INBOX.Archive
* 1239 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen $X-ME-Annot-2 $HasAttachment $IsNotification $IsMailingList $NotJunk $CanUnsubscribe)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen $X-ME-Annot-2 $HasAttachment $IsNotification $IsMailingList $NotJunk $CanUnsubscribe \*)] Ok
* OK [UNSEEN 1221] Ok
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1108730350] Ok
* OK [UIDNEXT 2231] Ok
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 40306873] Ok
* OK [MAILBOXID (210306ee-5833-456b-bede-6d04757128b3)] Ok
* OK [URLMECH INTERNAL] Ok
* OK [ANNOTATIONS 65536] Ok
. OK [READ-WRITE] Completed
. FETCH 1 MODSEQ
* OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 40306873] CONDSTORE enabled by FETCH MODSEQ
* 1 FETCH (MODSEQ (39570709))
. OK Completed (0.000 sec)
And... the * operator ranges. . FETCH 2231:* (UID MODSEQ)
* 1239 FETCH (UID 2230 MODSEQ (40306872))
. OK Completed (0.001 sec)
Source: have also implemented both client and server side IMAP, and reviewed RFC9051 very closely.And it is a pretty bad query language compared to something like SQL.
Yes. Regardless of the email protocol, third-party clients will always be horrible as long as corporations view email as their enterprise moat.