Our remedies proposal in DOJ's search distribution case

After reading it, Google gave me a pop survey about how I felt about G after reading it. It was like some bizarre A/B testing.

I said Worse because the blog completely rejected the court’s findings and offered up some bread crumbs to the peasants.

nyt: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/20/technology/google-antitru...

Google's own AI Lab hilariously recommends a vastly more radical breakup plan than the DOJ is asking for. To protect the markets it recommends breaking Google up into no fewer than seven companies!

1) We should get to continue doing what we did. It makes a lot of money and we want to keep doing it

2) If we listened to the court in full, well, that would be communism and the terrorists winning all-in-one, due to the court, in effect, "[designing] your online experience," which Google and only Google should get to do. Search is Google's exclusive domain (but not in a crazy monopolistic way!)

3) This landscape is highly dynamic. In only the last year, Google has completely ruined Google through the innovative use of AI. Would a hyper intelligent monopoly do that?! I think not

4) The REAL harm in this market? The pain the Court inflicts on Mozilla by attacking us, poor and/or expert Google. Mozilla is like a little baby. Think of the children (Mozilla)