What kind of anarcho-tyranny is that?
If you buy something that was stolen, the original owner has the right to get it back without compensation to you.
More broadly I think it does make a certain sort of sense that a theft should be resolved by the police. Find your item and want it back? Get the police involved. It's just that these days we're all so used the police being completely ineffectual that taking matters into your own hands is the only "sensible" solution.
In reality things are not so stiff. My dads bag was stolen from the train. The thief was apprehended on the station. He got his bag back from the cops because it had identifiable information in it. Perhaps a bit light on evidence that the thief was not the owner, but it's not always overly complicated. I think the thief got the right nudge.
A fun thought experiment is that in the time you might have left your car parked in the street, it might be stolen, sold bona fide, then (by happenstance) parked in the same area, so one day you just go back to it and drive it away.
I guess in a more practical sense, you could claim that's (more or less) what happened after recovering your possessions after having them stolen... what would happen in that edge case?
Does not change anything. I mean poor guy, became a victim of a fraudster, but what does my bike have to do with it?
>you cannot repurpose the product yourself
This is not repurposing, this is its prevention.
>solutions of real world capitalist conundrums
There is no conundrums, it is pure tyranny.