> They're full time developers exclusively for git?
"Exclusive" is a bit silly but yes, most of the people discussed in this article are paid to develop Git full time. > They're full time developers exclusively for git?
"Exclusive" is a bit silly but yes, most of the people discussed in this article are paid to develop Git full time.Who owns github again?
What are you trying to get at? It's not a conspiracy theory, it's people who just want to be able to be more effective at getting things done.