> not to pull the existing rug, so to speak, but to leave it be
How is this different from just using the old version before the "rug pull"?
How is this different from just using the old version before the "rug pull"?
this post exists because of the price of being an open source developer, your solution is to demand more free work?
Stop treating it like they are demanding open source developers do something or are acting entitled because they aren't. They are discussing how, if a project owner wants something (more goodwill when changing licenses), they might do that effectively.
You don't have to think redis should have been handled differently but that doesn't mean you should derail this person's thread.