>
One day someone with a bone to pick with HN and large enough pockets will test it in the courts.One day that may happen. I hope HN prevails. I'm a EU citizen and a big proponent of GDPR. However, I also believe in the value of the commons, our shared conversations. I consider the mass deletions on one's entire history of comments to a public forum, to be a very selfish act, harmful to society. I'm very much with 'dang here: community and society at large[0] has a stake here, too. Conversations here are part of public record, they contain wealth of knowledge useful to people who find it in the future. It's not that different from Stack Exchange, really. I'd like to believe GDPR would be fine with a more surgical deletion approach, as 'dang proposes, but I guess we'll have to wait for some court to opine on it.
Possibly relevant: I consider this entitlement to have all one's contributions to public boards deleted under GDPR to be the same kind of selfish, antisocial thinking as the whining about LLMs training on one's published Internet comments without attribution (and subsequent desire to delete them, or not to publish anything again on-line). I may be weird, but I don't believe anyone is entitled to all value their labor provides in perpetuity. Society can't function when everyone tries to capture everything for themselves; it works best when people let other use some of the value freely. We need the commons.
--
[0] - It's a publicly viewable board, after all.