"But DeepMind said GenCast surpassed the precision of the center's forecasts in more than 97 percent of the 1,320 real-world scenarios from 2019 which they were both tested on."
Great, so it's using historical data to make a prediction about what has already happened. I want to see it on current data where it is truly a prediction with no data to make that prediction.
I'm not convinced the results haven't been juiced/salted
That's ok though because it doesn't know it's acting on old data. Researchers would give it data and ask for the 15 day forecast, the researchers then compare against that real world data. And as noted, "it surpassed the centres forecast in more than 97 percent" of those tests. This is all referred to as backtesting.
I've worked on several projects trying to use AI to model various CFD calculations. We could trivially get 90+ percent accuracy on a bunch of metrics, the problem is that its almost always the really important and critical cases that end up being wrong in the AI model.
and hilariously it was completely wrong (like 12% hit rate or something). I complained online and i forget the exact scope of my lack of understanding but suffice to say i did not earn respect that day!
> GenCast is trained on 40 years of best-estimate analysis from 1979 to 2018, taken from the publicly available ERA5 (fifth generation ECMWF reanalysis) reanalysis dataset