That sentiment is event older than that. IIRC, it was fairly common for classical authors to complain bitterly about how lazy their slaves were. They thought they deserved more effort and enthusiasm from them, because they only considered things from their selfish elite perspective.
This blog post really made this type of error clear to me: https://acoup.blog/2024/08/16/fireside-friday-august-16-2024... (read the whole thing):
> [weakness with George R. R. Martin’s worldbuilding of the Night’s Watch]
> And sure, from the elite perspective, this all makes sense. Someone needs to stand on the wall, so we’ll send someone (over time, increasingly low-status, disposable someones) to do it, provide them very minimal comforts necessary for minimum survival and decree harsh punishments should they ever leave their military-penal colony. For a Warden of the North in Winterfell or a King in King’s Landing, that all makes sense.
> But consider it for a moment from the perspective of the brothers of the Night’s Watch. Sure, someone needs to stand on this wall, but it doesn’t need to be them. Fear of the Others or Wildlings is useless here: that answers why someone needs to be here, but not why I need to be here. Some people will self-sacrifice for the community with no thought to other rewards (money, prestige, status), but they are very, very few.