> In this case, it's a fscking nazi sympathiser jumping to the fore of a presidential election from nothing.
Why do you call him "a fscking nazi sympathiser" ?
Why do you call him "a fscking nazi sympathiser" ?
Sorry, you'll have to deal with translating yourself, but current browsers make it easy
For context, Romania's fascist movement, prominent in the late 30s, was called "legionaries"
And (ironically) simply convinces people that those who are concerned about Putin's arguably fascist (as opposed to actual Nazi) inclinations are just hyperventilating and overreacting.
Thus, promoting his (and Orbán)'s longevity.
Why is this wrong?
Huh... you know, I never tought about it like that. But I don't disagree with with this statement. thanks