It is laughable to suggest that the basis for this ruling is anything less than fear and paranoia about Chinese government softpower. Nothing they could have said, and no fact they could bring to bear, would change the outcome of the court, which has been predetermined, for better or worse, by the current American political climate.
Facebook (and Messenger)
Instagram
Pinterest
Twitter
Blogger
Tumblr
Tinder
Blogspot
New York Times
The Financial Times
The Economist
The Wall Street Journal
Bloomberg
Google News
Wikipedia
YouTube
Netflix
Vimeo
Google Search
Bing
Yahoo
DuckDuckGo
Messenger (and Facebook)
WeChat
SnapChat
Telegram
SignalChina can do it because China doesn't have the First Amendment, which is, you know, sort of the whole point...
>TikTok, whose mainland Chinese and Hong Kong[3] counterpart is Douyin,[a][4] is a short-form video hosting service (...)
>While TikTok and Douyin share a similar user interface, the platforms operate separately.[28][4][29] Douyin includes an in-video search feature that can search by people's faces for more videos of them, along with other features such as buying, booking hotels, and making geo-tagged reviews.[30]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok
So I think even TikTok (app for non-China markets) isn't available in China.
A) About “Americans”
B) Freedom of Speech
If TikTok bans a post from user846859347 which American’s freedom of speech are we talking about. 98.65% of shit on TT is bot-generated propaganda and removing it isn’t violating anyone’s freedom of speech
Who could possibly take issue with such a technology!