The problematic aspect of this argument is that if expanded to the whole society, it can lead to a very dark place.
I come from a place that has 40K+ murders per year [1]. People literally dies all the time there, and as much everyone is so fed up with corruption and inequality, I strongly believe that institutions, law, and order are the best solution once I experimented it in another place.
People all over the internet are using the narrative related to the insurance industry that let people die, and this CEO was the sacrificial lamb of this narrative. Its an easy thing to do since it's a direct cause and consequence thing.
But expanding the same logic, should politicians have the same treatment since their decisions have way more consequences [2]? Of course not.
As someone who saw civilization and savagery, I would choose the first in a heartbeat, and the main issue here is the incentive structure that rounds the health system in USA and why the political class does not take action to change it.
[1] - https://www.statista.com/statistics/312455/number-homicides-...
[2] - https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/eleicoes-40-candidatos-mor...