Hacker News Reader

Comment by 93po | Hacker News Reader

if you do basic chatgpt prompts in late 2024 asking for dynamic story telling, sure, you'll get what you said. it's super dismissive to think that wont get better over time, or that even with the tools today, that you can't get dynamic and interesting stories out of it if you provide it with the proper framework

View on HN

> it's super dismissive to think that wont get better over time

When did we start thinking this way? That things HAVE to get better and in fact to think otherwise is very negative? Is HN under a massive hot hand fallacy delusion?

Lots of people want that AI grift money and need to be pollyanna true believers to convince others that models that don't know truth are useful decision makers

How could creativity in AI not get better?

Sure, progress will likely not be linear or without challenges, but we already have the human brain as proof that it is possible.

Mountains exist, but that doesn't mean we'll ever build a structure the size of Everest.

If you compare the historical rate of improvements in computing power and algorithms vs rate of improvements in building scale, you'll find one is a whole lot more likely to reach its goal, even if the rate of progress slows significantly.

There is absolutely no evidence to suggest one of these is more likely within reach. We at least know how Mt. Everest works.

You're saying AI, the parent I'm replying to is talking about ChatGPT. They aren't the same thing.

ChatGPT is a product that exists beyond just LLMs and I do use it synonymously with natural language interface AI

No it doesn't and no one else does so you're going to be really confusing in conversations.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com