Hacker News Reader

Comment by mytailorisrich | Hacker News Reader

This has been the case for decades now.

The US economy is much more dynamic than Europe's and the US government is actually more willing to intervene (and can afford it because of US dollar).

In Europe it is austerity and general less support for economy-boosting policies.

View on HN

There are a lot of perspectives. Eg. that the US due to it geopolitical situation hasn't seen any real adverse events in the past century. Ie. privileged on the risk side.

As other people also mention: The US' growth seems to be debt driven, which will also have to halt at some point.

However, it would not seem like it is US dynanisism that is the reason for the current success of the country - especially taken into account that it is a small subset (eg. the magnificent 7) and very high valuations that drive the current success.

All in all, my personal view is that there is significant risk in the US market currently - thus also high returns. But I do think that it is safer to harbour some money outside of the US.

Personally, I am happy to have US stocks in my portfolio, I am also happy not to live there.

So the US economy is built on debt

Europe has massive debts, too, and growing. But this is a downward spiral.

Edit:

Average government debt-to-GDP ratio in the EU was around 60% from 2000 to 2008. It is 88% now and worse in many major countries. No lie here...

> Europe has massive debts, too, and growing

This is a lie, take Sweden's debt for example it has been going down the past 20 years. Most of Europe doesn't see increasing debt, USA is an outlier.

https://tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp#:...

Sweden is an outlier. US debt to GDP is 110%. France and the UK 99%. Italy 138%. Greece 203%. Japan 263%. China depends on who you believe, but probably somewhere around 100%.

All economies are built on debt... It's basically how money works...

No that is not how money works, it is one way money can work but it isn't how money works. Many economies are debt free, because there is no reason to go into debt to have money.

> Many economies are debt free, because there is no reason to go into debt to have money.

Is this intentionally facetious? There is NO reason to go into debt? Should we just return to the gold standard then?

There are also downsides to it. One of the benefits of debt is to have more liquidity. If nobody owed anybody anything, but at the same time it was very difficult to trade with anybody, you would have a very inflexible situation that might not really be preferable. Like if I'm sitting with goods you want, and you sit with goods I want, but we have no way to swap them, then we are both worse off.

The gold standard is not perfect but it's definitely better than what we have now. My ideal pick would be using the price of a basket of common commodities (wood, iron, wheat); pay the bank for storing your goods and don't let state actors & friends steal your money with inflation.

I don't think BTC is the solution (it's unbacked) but wtfhappenedin1971.com has some good reading material.

Isn't it better to have an economy based on debt than something people actually want or need? E.g. if we had a currency based on land, housing prices would soar even more than they already are at.

Money is debt. Green (or whatever color) slips of paper aren't intrinsically valuable. They're a promise to redeem them for things that are, same as an IOU.

I take your point that not every economy is run by a government that owes 110% of GDP. But Japan and China are, and France and the UK are at 99%, so that doesn't seem to be the whole secret of America's success.

Money is debt. Even gold-backed money. Possessing money is the same as lending your time, labor, or assets to everyone else. To be repaid this debt you issued, you can in turn demand time, labor, or assets from someone else.

@ Jensson: As the others have said.. You might mean something else with your statement, but you cannot escape that the very definition of money is owed debt: A bank note is in essence an IOU: "This represents value you can redeem later". You may have some idea you want to communicate about avoiding 'having a lot of debt' or owing more than you are worth, but money in human history has always been a mechanism of debt in its very nature. It represents being owed something else of value.

it only works for US Dollar because USA can pay back its debts by printing more money. other economies actually have to work for it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com