Yes but the notation of dot, plus such function names plus optional parens makes it sure read like English. That’s great but it’ll be a nightmare when you are also dealing with strings which similar English in it.

|> is a common way of writing the pipe in haskell, so

     words |> map read |> sum

IHP uses it a lot.

Would you propose the same change for nested function calls y = f(g(h(x))), changing it into y = x | h | g | f ?