Gambling is degenerate, chaotic and immoral.
Yotta is a savings account for gamblers. The moral argument is "Gambling is bad, these people tried to bet their cake and eat it too, on some level they got what was coming to them".
Just make sure to get it from an actual bank or credit union where your account will be directly FDIC or whatever the equivalent for credit unions is insured, instead of going through some fintech company where you account is with the fintech company where they store your money (commingled with other people's money) in a (hopefully insured!) bank but as far as the bank is concerned its all the fintech's money and you have no relationship with the bank.
But it seems that it was more positioned as "a safe investment with okay returns and a lottery chance at winning above average returns". Gamblers don't need to know about FDIC insurance and the like.
There was shady goings on that wasn't clear to depositors -- what isn't clear is WHERE that shadiness was happening, but that doesn't mean they "got what was coming to them".
The Mayflower called, they've lost a puritan again.
Second, are you really condescendingly equating compulsive gambling with escaping societal scale persecution or strife resulting from incompatibilities of religious belief with the State religion?
That's a bit of a stretch.