The influencer lawsuit that could change the industry
theverge.com
theverge.com
> If the argument is that Sheil is duplicating Gifford’s existence, there’s something to be said about the fact that the items both of them promote are also imitations of someone else’s work.
Lawsuit dismissed, no industry change.
But seriously, the tawdry commercialism being imitated is hardly novel or innovative. It’s all derivative drivel, intentionally devoid of substance or character, intrinsically noncommittal, and bleach-sterilized against any potential intellectual fecundity.
I can see the point of irritation, but I seriously doubt that this can reasonably be considered infringement.