Instagram actively helping spread of self-harm among teenagers, study finds
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
https://drive.usercontent.google.com/download?id=1MZrFRii_nJ...
via their Google Drive link at:
https://www.digitaltansvar.dk/viden/analyser
The article left me wondering whether they actually cultivated a network of kids interested in self-harm. It sounds from the study (such as it is) that they in fact just simulated vulnerable 13-year-olds’ accounts.
Which comes as something of a relief from an ethical point of view.
I wonder, though, if that method may have confounded their findings. I could imagine Instagram’s recommenders linking their simulated 13-year-olds’ accounts based on signals indicating their common association with the research organization (rather than purely on the basis of their shared interest in self-harm).
Maybe somebody with stronger Danish than mine could shed light?
>fake profiles of people as young as 13 years old
That's like an oxymoron. "Actively" implies taking action.
Instagram is passively helping the spread of self-harm among teenagers.
Maybe they mean it's current and on-going.
You left off the rest of the sentence which shows the active part.
Actively? No, failing to remove is not actively.
> and encouraging those engaging with such content to befriend one another