Gen Z's definition of financial success includes joining the top 1%
fortune.com
fortune.com
I am very much an upper income earner and yet I could not afford any ‘average’ house in any suburb I’d actually want to live in.
The delusion, or naivety, is that they'll find success. Then again what's the alternative? Death.
One reasonable definition of financial _success_, an acceptable endgame state, is "you have enough that you can live a baseline lifestyle that doesn't feel impoverished through passive income / interest".
In the UK as a single person 1-2M GBP is probably enough and for a family depending on expectations maybe 3-4ish. 3% a year withdrawal gives you 30/60/90K/120K pa, then you pay taxes. Nice, but not footballer private jet crazy life money, depending on the banding there you'll rent a house, have a nice car, the odd restaurant, and not worry about the price tags at the supermarket.
If you look at it another way it ends up being about as much as the median person earns throughout their working life. Basically, if you manage to front load that same amount of earnings then you're "successful".
Those numbers work out around the 1-5% mark in the UK, I imagine the same is true in the US.
I'm honestly kind of shocked that a half a million dollars per year is insufficient to be in the top 1% of earners in 18 states.
They are by definition also the youngest in the survey. Youthful overconfidence is a thing so may not have anything to do with generations