Yeah, I don't think that is going to work, especially because you are for-profit organization not SETI
Yeah, I don't think that is going to work, especially because you are for-profit organization not SETI
And empirically, it seems to be working. The number of contributing machines is currently in the six figures. The main risk right now is on the demand side, i.e. whether or not people want this type of compute.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120329124823AA...
It does in bring into question whether or not gridspot.exe was installed nefariously.
With enough people involved, the compute version of this could be self-sustaining, and the infrastructure guys just take a wee percentage. They are unlikely to be replaced by purely free infrastructure, because money is involved (even if in the form of credits). If there was a shortage at particular time, some people might supply that themselves, for extra cash. Distributed compute supply = local compute supply, with latency advantages.
People install their program, contribute the power of their computers for free and Gridspot takes money.
Why would anyone do this? Why would anyone contribute their computer resource for other people to make money from that? I would rather, I don't know, mine bitcoins or set up a Tor proxy.