> "source code free to see and to modify (and redistribute, if applicable)"
You have to see the humor in putting both of these in the same comment, right? That's a prime example of what they're talking about!
Creative Commons is very clear in its license and it - rightfully - doesn't get as much complaint as open-source evangelists about its lingo.
Having to say "but technically a product is anything that is produced" to go against a expected reading and then complain about pedantry in the same comment is way more humorous as it's a prime example of what they're talking about.